...Ireland, it is often too feebly founded in England, and particularly in London, where it is sometime» entirely sunk ; and it may, perhaps, be worthy of...provided we avoid a too forcible pronunciation of the r, »hen it ends a word, or is followed by u consonant in ¡he same syllabic, we may givo as much force...

...beginning of the letter, as to produce that harshness we call the Irish accent. But if this letter is too forcibly pronounced in Ireland, it is often too...particularly in London, where it is sometimes entirely sunk." Walker concludes that "provided we avoid a too forcible pronunciation of the r, when it ends a word,...

...Walker (1825, 62-3) says of <r> in standard English: 'this letter is never silent ... If this letter is too forcibly pronounced in Ireland, it is often too...particularly in London, where it is sometimes entirely sunk.' Walker's prescription of rhotic pronunciations - followed by Nuttafl - indicates that, far from being...

...accent. But if this letter is too forcibly pronounced in Ireland, it is often too feebly pronounced in England, and particularly in London, where it is sometimes entirely sunk; it may, perhaps, be worthy observation that, provided we avoid too forcible a pronunciation of the...

...beginning of the letter, as to produce that harshness we call the Irish accent. But if this letter is too forcibly pronounced in Ireland, it is often too...when it ends a word, or is followed by a consonant in tbt same syllable, we may give as much force as we please to this letter, at the beginning of a word,...

...beginning of the nineteenth century. Walker (1968: 50) states with respect to /r/: "But if this letter is too forcibly pronounced in Ireland, it is often too...particularly in London, where it is sometimes entirely sunk." It seems therefore possible that Edgeworth intended both <h>-insertions to represent an intervocalic...